Universe Existence


     The oldest profession in the world is not what would be commonly accepted in
society. Before a woman had a chance to sell her body, people looked up at the
stars and wondered what they were. They made figures out of the shapes they
made. As we advanced through scientific research many other doors opened that
allowed us to see what it was the earth is existing in. Our constant need to
explain what is happening comes from our want to control. Knowledge is power,
and nothing is more unexplained that the universe. Time is interlocked and must
be understood if we want to accomplish a deep knowledge of the cosmos. Commonly
it was thought that there was no such knowledge. The author Stephen Hawking had
shown many otherwise. His books give a deep history and knowledge of how the
universe exists. He also explains many others aspects of the cosmos and puts his
works in an understandable writing style. He puts the largest accent on his
studies of black holes. These are fascinating happening and the way to
understanding the universe and several others can be found through the study of
black holes. There are several features of black holes that makes them
incredibly fascinating. The first one would be the common misconception of how
noting can escape a black hole. This is true in most points. If nothing can
escape them, how does one detect a black hole? Stephen Hawking discovered a
fascinating aspect using anti-particle properties. He found that when matter is
pulled into a black hole by gravity matter is constantly being pulled apart.

This causes the anti-parties of matter to be throw away at incredible rates.

This happens at consistent times. The large amount of gamma radiation let off by
this is how Mr. Hawking now finds black holes. Another interesting concept of
black holes is they are can be formed other ways than by the end of a starís
life. Stephen Hawking and his associates found that any nuclear explosion can
cause the birth of a black hole. Hawking stated that is all the "heavy
water", a component used in nuclear weapons, was used to create a nuclear
explosion a black hole the size of earth would be created. He also stated no one
would be around to witness the creation. It would have been caused by the
implosion of earth at a massive rate and the amount of energy produced by the
nuclear explosion. This had me wondering. Stephen Hawking also stated that is a
black how small enough not to disturb the orbit of earth existed close enough to
earth that itís power could be harnessed to produce huge amounts of energy.

This made me wonder if the same concept could be used, except with all the
wastes materials on earth. I do not know the exact physics of it all, but from

Mr. Hawking explanations it seemed like it might work. Black holes were also
explained by Stephen Hawking as how they transcended time. Apparently the
massive gravitational pull creates a rip in the space-time continuum. It is
unknown what happens to matter when it is pulled into a black time wise. All
matter will be ejected into space eventually as the black hole loses itself. The
smaller a black hole, the more matter is ejected. It may be an odd happening,
but because of the larger black holes are harder to detect than smaller black
holes. Mr. Hawking stated of how if an astronaught gets pulled into a black hole
the tidal forces would stretch him into a long piece of spaghetti like person.

However, his life would not end in the black hole. Given enough time he would be
eventually ejected into space as particles. All matter in a black hole will
eventually be lost into space. The smaller a black hole is, the more matter is
lost by the black hole. Stephen Hawking explained what is thought to have
happened to a black hole when all its matter is lost. The hole in the space-time
continuum would collapse and an explosion as massive as on of a supernova would
happen. It would leave the tear in time. I wondered when the explosion would
happen? Would it happen now, or ten to trillions of years from when it actually
collapses. The tear in time where would it exist? Until an actual black hole is
found close enough to us I suppose these questions will remain uninsured.

Stephen Hawking explains many other aspects of universal development in his
books. The "hot big bang" theory of how our universe was created is the
commonly accepted version of how our field of existence came to be. Stephen

Hawking explains how the eventual fall of this explanation of this theory is
that the energy would be limited to the heat of the single mass at the
beginning. This would lead to an eventual massive cooling of the universe and a
lack of energy would be felt throughout space. It was also explained by Stephen

Hawking of how other universes exist in other areas. How can infinite be
limited? If our universe is infinite then how do other universes exist in other
realms? It was also said of if the big bang had not happened the exact way it
did, we would not exist the way we do now. In fact nothing would be the way it
is now if the big bang would have been cooler or if itís expansion had not
been as rapid or had slowed down by even the smallest margin. Stephen Hawking
explains this as a group of monkeyís pounding away at keyboards. Most of what
they will produce will be nothing but garbage and gibberish. Once and a while
though, they will create a masterpiece. What if our universe is the master piece
and all the others have just been garbage. Anthropology would have us think
different. It was a given example of who we can see ourselves as a rich man sees
poverty in his neighborhood. They never do. Just as a poor man hears about a
booming economy, he could say to himself "what booming economy?". We see the
universe because we are who we are and where we are. That is the only reason we
can question the facts of our existence. Sometimes we answer questions that were
never supposed to be address. Space-time has always been in question. Time
travel would give a mad unlimited powers. He could act as a god, change the
world the way he wanted. If the outcome did not meet satisfaction, then travel
back in time and re-work the problem until satisfaction. If time travel is
possible, how come no one from the future has given us the secrets to do so. Is
it because the future has not been acted out yet, or has it been and we are
simply the past and we are seeing it as the present? Time travel has been a long
debated subject. Once such debate is that of can it even be done. Many models of
the big bang suggest yes it can. The theory of relativity says that is cannot be
done. The theory of relativity says that "wormholes" do exist. Einstein
called them bridges though. Stephen Hawking explained wormholes as something
that creates a bridge between two regions of space. These wormholes are shorter
than the actual distance between the two regions. Space can be though of as a
piece of paper being folder over and over itself. It could have many layers to
it. Wormholes might simply connect two regions of space that seem to be millions
upon millions of miles apart from each other. Going through a wormhole would
allow you to reach a point before you actually left. If you leave the wormhole
to come back you would come back to your point of origin before you actually
left to go anywhere. You would then be in your history. There is a lot of
controversy over what would happen to you at this point. Stephen Hawking gave
many point: would you become helpless as history took you over. You would have
no control over what you did as you would simply be acting out past that way it
was supposed to be. Or would you be completely independent in your actions. You
could have control to a point. History could rewrite itself to a point. Or would
you have major repercussions upon history. If you did travel through history why
was is not written in before it happened. If one did travel through space it
would already be written in time of what happened. The example given was what
would happen if you travel back in time and killed your great-great grandfather.

This would cause a ripple in time. If this happened it would have been written
in time and you would go back in time and be unable to control yourself as you
are just acting out history as the way it is written. If you did kill your past
relative you would end your life yourself, thus making the even never happen.

You still continue to exist though, so how could you have killed him? The sheer
thought of this is mind-boggling. It is a paradox of what would happen. Maybe
this is why we have not been told of how to build a time machine. Our primitive
ways and violent acts, why would we give ourselves this weapon of infinite
power? Another way of explaining time travel is that all things happen, just in
different time fields. A scientist named Richard Feynman stated that quantum
theory is simply a sum of the physics. All things happen, we simply do not
expierivce them all. If time travel was possible then it would be possible to go
into a different "time slot" and see things the way they could happen if
different happenings did occur. Time travel is a concept that should not be
messed with and should not be taken lightly. If someone traveled though time and
infinite number of things could change just by the slightest occurrence. Until
we fully understand the repercussions, time travel should be understood, but not
done. Stephen Hawking is a well known professor at Cambridge University. He has
made many advances in the understandings of the cosmos, time, and the universe.

I would recommend his writings to anyone with an open mind and with a wanting to
learn.

Bibliography

"A Brief History of Time" Stephen Hawking Bantam Books, November 1996

"Black Hole and Baby Universes" Stephen Hawking Cambridge Univ. Press, 1980